You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Epidemic Microclusters of Blood-Culture Proven Sepsis in Very-Low-Birth Weight Infants: Experience of the German Neonatal Network
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0038304 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christoph Härtel, Kirstin Faust, Stefan Avenarius, Bettina Bohnhorst, Michael Emeis, Corinna Gebauer, Peter Groneck, Friedhelm Heitmann, Thomas Hoehn, Mechthild Hubert, Angela Kribs, Helmut Küster, Reinhard Laux, Michael Mögel, Dirk Müller, Dirk Olbertz, Claudia Roll, Jens Siegel, Anja Stein, Matthias Vochem, Ursula Weller, Axel von der Wense, Christian Wieg, Jürgen Wintgens, Claudia Hemmelmann, Arne Simon, Egbert Herting, Wolfgang Göpel |
| Abstract |
We evaluated blood culture-proven sepsis episodes occurring in microclusters in very-low-birth-weight infants born in the German Neonatal Network (GNN) during 2009-2010. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Other | 12 | 21% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 55% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2013.
All research outputs
#18,329,207
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#153,980
of 193,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,287
of 164,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,130
of 3,988 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,988 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.