↓ Skip to main content

Collective Motion of Humans in Mosh and Circle Pits at Heavy Metal Concerts

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 26,145)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
364 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Collective Motion of Humans in Mosh and Circle Pits at Heavy Metal Concerts
Published in
Physical Review Letters, May 2013
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.110.228701
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesse L. Silverberg, Matthew Bierbaum, James P. Sethna, Itai Cohen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 976 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 364 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 3%
United Kingdom 5 1%
Germany 4 1%
Spain 2 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 329 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 13%
Researcher 25 7%
Student > Master 20 5%
Student > Bachelor 15 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 2%
Other 38 10%
Unknown 208 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 40 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 7%
Engineering 17 5%
Unspecified 16 4%
Computer Science 12 3%
Other 47 13%
Unknown 208 57%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1188. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2019.
All research outputs
#2,404
of 12,829,386 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#4
of 26,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22
of 247,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#1
of 1,830 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,829,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,830 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.