↓ Skip to main content

Using three-dimensional surface area to compare the growth of two Pocilloporid coral species

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using three-dimensional surface area to compare the growth of two Pocilloporid coral species
Published in
Marine Biology, August 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00227-008-1040-x
Authors

Glen Holmes, Juan Ortiz, Paulina Kaniewska, Ron Johnstone

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Réunion 1 1%
Unknown 72 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 32%
Researcher 16 21%
Student > Master 11 14%
Other 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 72%
Environmental Science 11 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 5%
Unspecified 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 3 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,716,033
of 11,717,557 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#314
of 1,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,929
of 308,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,717,557 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.