You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Differential susceptibility of PCR reactions to inhibitors: an important and unrecognised phenomenon
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Research Notes, August 2008
|
DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-1-70 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jim F Huggett, Tanya Novak, Jeremy A Garson, Clare Green, Stephen D Morris-Jones, Robert F Miller, Alimuddin Zumla |
Abstract |
PCR inhibition by nucleic acid extracts is a well known yet poorly described phenomenon. Inhibition assessment generally depends on the assumption that inhibitors affect all PCR reactions to the same extent; i.e. that the reaction of interest and the control reaction are equally susceptible to inhibition. To test this assumption we performed inhibition assessment on DNA extracts from human urine samples, fresh urine and EDTA using different PCR reactions. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 1% |
Unknown | 263 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 51 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 18% |
Student > Master | 45 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 30 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 5% |
Other | 38 | 14% |
Unknown | 52 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 89 | 32% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 62 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 5% |
Engineering | 15 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 10 | 4% |
Other | 27 | 10% |
Unknown | 62 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,074,378
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#251
of 4,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,476
of 95,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them