↓ Skip to main content

Why do men have worse COVID-19-related outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis with sex adjusted for age

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 1,270)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why do men have worse COVID-19-related outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis with sex adjusted for age
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, January 2022
DOI 10.1590/1414-431x2021e11711
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Fabião, B. Sassi, E.F. Pedrollo, F. Gerchman, C.K. Kramer, C.B. Leitão, L.C. Pinto

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 52 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 53 65%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 176. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#242,899
of 26,450,612 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#6
of 1,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,130
of 532,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#1
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,450,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 532,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.