You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Toddler foods and milks don’t stack up against regular foods and milks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-022-00765-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer McCann, Kelsey Beckford, Holly Beswick, Melanie Chisholm, Julie Woods |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 24% |
| Australia | 8 | 21% |
| Ireland | 3 | 8% |
| Mexico | 2 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 39% |
| Scientists | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 15% |
| Psychology | 1 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#486,269
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#153
of 1,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,374
of 453,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.