You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Red Brain, Blue Brain: Evaluative Processes Differ in Democrats and Republicans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0052970 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Darren Schreiber, Greg Fonzo, Alan N. Simmons, Christopher T. Dawes, Taru Flagan, James H. Fowler, Martin P. Paulus |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 741 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 230 | 31% |
| Japan | 14 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 2% |
| Canada | 10 | 1% |
| Poland | 10 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 8 | 1% |
| Australia | 7 | <1% |
| Italy | 7 | <1% |
| Spain | 7 | <1% |
| Other | 72 | 10% |
| Unknown | 363 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 651 | 88% |
| Scientists | 49 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 21 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 298 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 11% |
| Researcher | 34 | 10% |
| Professor | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 75 | 23% |
| Unknown | 52 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 76 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 70 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 24 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 60 | 18% |
| Unknown | 68 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 967. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,611
of 25,984,008 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#259
of 226,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75
of 299,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#8
of 5,172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,984,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226,896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.