↓ Skip to main content

Randomised placebo-controlled trials of individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 2,034)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
377 tweeters
facebook
73 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
Title
Randomised placebo-controlled trials of individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Systematic Reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-3-142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert T Mathie, Suzanne M Lloyd, Lynn A Legg, Jürgen Clausen, Sian Moss, Jonathan RT Davidson, Ian Ford

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 377 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 179 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 47 25%
Researcher 27 15%
Student > Master 24 13%
Other 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 35 19%
Unknown 23 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 10%
Psychology 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 34 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 350. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#80,012
of 23,398,349 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#6
of 2,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#836
of 363,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,398,349 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.