↓ Skip to main content

Randomised placebo-controlled trials of individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 2,251)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
379 X users
facebook
73 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
Title
Randomised placebo-controlled trials of individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Systematic Reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-3-142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert T Mathie, Suzanne M Lloyd, Lynn A Legg, Jürgen Clausen, Sian Moss, Jonathan RT Davidson, Ian Ford

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 379 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 191 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 49 25%
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Master 24 12%
Other 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 32 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 10%
Psychology 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 44 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 354. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2024.
All research outputs
#92,372
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#6
of 2,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#882
of 373,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.