↓ Skip to main content

Starling Flock Networks Manage Uncertainty in Consensus at Low Cost

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 9,055)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
273 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Starling Flock Networks Manage Uncertainty in Consensus at Low Cost
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002894
Pubmed ID
Authors

George F. Young, Luca Scardovi, Andrea Cavagna, Irene Giardina, Naomi E. Leonard

Abstract

Flocks of starlings exhibit a remarkable ability to maintain cohesion as a group in highly uncertain environments and with limited, noisy information. Recent work demonstrated that individual starlings within large flocks respond to a fixed number of nearest neighbors, but until now it was not understood why this number is seven. We analyze robustness to uncertainty of consensus in empirical data from multiple starling flocks and show that the flock interaction networks with six or seven neighbors optimize the trade-off between group cohesion and individual effort. We can distinguish these numbers of neighbors from fewer or greater numbers using our systems-theoretic approach to measuring robustness of interaction networks as a function of the network structure, i.e., who is sensing whom. The metric quantifies the disagreement within the network due to disturbances and noise during consensus behavior and can be evaluated over a parameterized family of hypothesized sensing strategies (here the parameter is number of neighbors). We use this approach to further show that for the range of flocks studied the optimal number of neighbors does not depend on the number of birds within a flock; rather, it depends on the shape, notably the thickness, of the flock. The results suggest that robustness to uncertainty may have been a factor in the evolution of flocking for starlings. More generally, our results elucidate the role of the interaction network on uncertainty management in collective behavior, and motivate the application of our approach to other biological networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 273 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Hungary 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 176 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 31%
Researcher 27 15%
Student > Master 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Professor 10 5%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 28 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 43 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 17%
Physics and Astronomy 24 13%
Computer Science 14 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 33 18%
Unknown 33 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 449. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2022.
All research outputs
#63,411
of 25,856,713 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#41
of 9,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#326
of 292,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#1
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.