↓ Skip to main content

Experimental Gingivitis Induces Systemic Inflammatory Markers in Young Healthy Individuals: A Single-Subject Interventional Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experimental Gingivitis Induces Systemic Inflammatory Markers in Young Healthy Individuals: A Single-Subject Interventional Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0055265
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jörg Eberhard, Karsten Grote, Maren Luchtefeld, Wieland Heuer, Harald Schuett, Dimitar Divchev, Ralph Scherer, Ruth Schmitz-Streit, Daniela Langfeldt, Nico Stumpp, Ingmar Staufenbiel, Bernhard Schieffer, Meike Stiesch

Abstract

We here investigated whether experimental gingivitis enhances systemic markers of inflammation which are also known as surrogate markers of atherosclerotic plaque development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Unknown 118 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 16%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 10%
Researcher 10 8%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 25 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,800,821
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#22,008
of 222,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,765
of 291,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#496
of 5,063 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,063 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.