↓ Skip to main content

Topical pharmacologic interventions versus placebo for epidemic keratoconjunctivitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Topical pharmacologic interventions versus placebo for epidemic keratoconjunctivitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013520.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Su-Hsun Liu, Barbara S Hawkins, Sueko M Ng, Mark Ren, Louis Leslie, Genie Han, Irene C Kuo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 12%
Other 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Researcher 8 8%
Lecturer 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 54 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Psychology 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Materials Science 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 61 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,208,227
of 26,166,431 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,824
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,466
of 454,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,166,431 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.