You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
What Are the Causes of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in Japan?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11999-013-2820-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yasuhiko Kasahara, Tokifumi Majima, Shoichi Kimura, Osamu Nishiike, Jun Uchida |
Abstract |
There is limited information regarding the cause of revision TKA in Asia, especially Japan. Owing to differences in patient backgrounds and lifestyles, the modes of TKA failures in Asia may differ from those in Western countries. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 89 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
Researcher | 8 | 9% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
Other | 16 | 18% |
Unknown | 29 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 37% |
Engineering | 8 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Materials Science | 4 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Unknown | 34 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,621,629
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#767
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,017
of 291,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#12
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.