↓ Skip to main content

Is Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Effective in Modulating Brain Oscillations?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
353 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Effective in Modulating Brain Oscillations?
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0056589
Pubmed ID
Authors

Debora Brignani, Manuela Ruzzoli, Piercarlo Mauri, Carlo Miniussi

Abstract

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a promising tool for modulating brain oscillations, as well as a possible therapeutic intervention. However, the lack of conclusive evidence on whether tACS is able to effectively affect cortical activity continues to limit its application. The present study aims to address this issue by exploiting the well-known inhibitory alpha rhythm in the posterior parietal cortex during visual perception and attention orientation. Four groups of healthy volunteers were tested with a Gabor patch detection and discrimination task. All participants were tested at the baseline and selective frequencies of tACS, including Sham, 6 Hz, 10 Hz, and 25 Hz. Stimulation at 6 Hz and 10 Hz over the occipito-parietal area impaired performance in the detection task compared to the baseline. The lack of a retinotopically organised effect and marginal frequency-specificity modulation in the detection task force us to be cautious about the effectiveness of tACS in modulating brain oscillations. Therefore, the present study does not provide significant evidence for tACS reliably inducing direct modulations of brain oscillations that can influence performance in a visual task.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 340 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 22%
Student > Master 62 18%
Researcher 61 17%
Student > Bachelor 40 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 7%
Other 45 13%
Unknown 44 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 111 31%
Neuroscience 74 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 8%
Engineering 16 5%
Other 24 7%
Unknown 72 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,175,181
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#15,472
of 202,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,449
of 291,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#365
of 5,167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.