↓ Skip to main content

Early-stage heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in the pig: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early-stage heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in the pig: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12968-016-0283-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ursula Reiter, Gert Reiter, Martin Manninger, Gabriel Adelsmayr, Julia Schipke, Alessio Alogna, Alexandra Rajces, Aurelien F. Stalder, Andreas Greiser, Christian Mühlfeld, Daniel Scherr, Heiner Post, Burkert Pieske, Michael Fuchsjäger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 24%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 18%
Engineering 7 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Physics and Astronomy 3 5%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 17 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,486,435
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#576
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,595
of 331,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#24
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.