You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Early-stage heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in the pig: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, September 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12968-016-0283-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ursula Reiter, Gert Reiter, Martin Manninger, Gabriel Adelsmayr, Julia Schipke, Alessio Alogna, Alexandra Rajces, Aurelien F. Stalder, Andreas Greiser, Christian Mühlfeld, Daniel Scherr, Heiner Post, Burkert Pieske, Michael Fuchsjäger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 14% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 24% |
Researcher | 9 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 12 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 18% |
Engineering | 7 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 18% |
Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,486,435
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#576
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,595
of 331,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#24
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.