↓ Skip to main content

Formalization, Annotation and Analysis of Diverse Drug and Probe Screening Assay Datasets Using the BioAssay Ontology (BAO)

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Formalization, Annotation and Analysis of Diverse Drug and Probe Screening Assay Datasets Using the BioAssay Ontology (BAO)
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0049198
Pubmed ID
Authors

Uma D. Vempati, Magdalena J. Przydzial, Caty Chung, Saminda Abeyruwan, Ahsan Mir, Kunie Sakurai, Ubbo Visser, Vance P. Lemmon, Stephan C. Schürer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Germany 1 2%
Bulgaria 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 53 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Other 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 27%
Chemistry 10 17%
Computer Science 9 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 8 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2022.
All research outputs
#5,892,972
of 23,298,349 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#73,826
of 199,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,617
of 180,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,253
of 4,731 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,298,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,731 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.