You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Differential health impact of intervention programs for time-varying disease risk: a measles vaccination modeling study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, March 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12916-022-02242-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Allison Portnoy, Yuli Lily Hsieh, Kaja Abbas, Petra Klepac, Heather Santos, Logan Brenzel, Mark Jit, Matthew Ferrari |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 35% |
United States | 4 | 24% |
Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 6% |
Malaysia | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 41% |
Scientists | 6 | 35% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 20% |
Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 10% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
Mathematics | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,603,122
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,673
of 3,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,519
of 432,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#34
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.