You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimating excess mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic analysis of COVID-19-related mortality, 2020–21
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02796-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Haidong Wang, Katherine R Paulson, Spencer A Pease, Stefanie Watson, Haley Comfort, Peng Zheng, Aleksandr Y Aravkin, Catherine Bisignano, Ryan M Barber, Tahiya Alam, John E Fuller, Erin A May, Darwin Phan Jones, Meghan E Frisch, Cristiana Abbafati, Christopher Adolph, Adrien Allorant, Joanne O Amlag, Bree Bang-Jensen, Gregory J Bertolacci, Sabina S Bloom, Austin Carter, Emma Castro, Suman Chakrabarti, Jhilik Chattopadhyay, Rebecca M Cogen, James K Collins, Kimberly Cooperrider, Xiaochen Dai, William James Dangel, Farah Daoud, Carolyn Dapper, Amanda Deen, Bruce B Duncan, Megan Erickson, Samuel B Ewald, Tatiana Fedosseeva, Alize J Ferrari, Joseph Jon Frostad, Nancy Fullman, John Gallagher, Amiran Gamkrelidze, Gaorui Guo, Jiawei He, Monika Helak, Nathaniel J Henry, Erin N Hulland, Bethany M Huntley, Maia Kereselidze, Alice Lazzar-Atwood, Kate E LeGrand, Akiaja Lindstrom, Emily Linebarger, Paulo A Lotufo, Rafael Lozano, Beatrice Magistro, Deborah Carvalho Malta, Johan Månsson, Ana M Mantilla Herrera, Fatima Marinho, Alemnesh H Mirkuzie, Awoke Temesgen Misganaw, Lorenzo Monasta, Paulami Naik, Shuhei Nomura, Edward G O'Brien, James Kevin O'Halloran, Latera Tesfaye Olana, Samuel M Ostroff, Louise Penberthy, Robert C Reiner Jr, Grace Reinke, Antonio Luiz P Ribeiro, Damian Francesco Santomauro, Maria Inês Schmidt, David H Shaw, Brittney S Sheena, Aleksei Sholokhov, Natia Skhvitaridze, Reed J D Sorensen, Emma Elizabeth Spurlock, Ruri Syailendrawati, Roman Topor-Madry, Christopher E Troeger, Rebecca Walcott, Ally Walker, Charles Shey Wiysonge, Nahom Alemseged Worku, Bethany Zigler, David M Pigott, Mohsen Naghavi, Ali H Mokdad, Stephen S Lim, Simon I Hay, Emmanuela Gakidou, Christopher J L Murray |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14,602 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1308 | 9% |
| United States | 795 | 5% |
| Mexico | 647 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 426 | 3% |
| Chile | 424 | 3% |
| Canada | 355 | 2% |
| Spain | 277 | 2% |
| Australia | 253 | 2% |
| France | 217 | 1% |
| Other | 1396 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8504 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13424 | 92% |
| Scientists | 624 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 366 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 179 | 1% |
| Unknown | 9 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 961 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 961 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 128 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 77 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 75 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 63 | 7% |
| Other | 59 | 6% |
| Other | 211 | 22% |
| Unknown | 348 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 192 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 55 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 45 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 44 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 4% |
| Other | 214 | 22% |
| Unknown | 372 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12778. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2023.
All research outputs
#103
of 24,503,376 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#10
of 41,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7
of 433,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#1
of 330 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,503,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 330 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.