You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Social media to enhance engagement and science dissemination during in-person and virtual medical conferences: the SCMR 2020 and 2021 experiences: a report of the SCMR social media task force
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-021-00837-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mrinali Shetty, Niti R. Aggarwal, Purvi Parwani, Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci, Juan Lopez-Mattei, Andrew Choi, Lars Grosse-Wortmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| India | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Librarian | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2023.
All research outputs
#8,615,011
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#705
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,605
of 449,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#11
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.