You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Antitumor effect and toxicity of free rhodium (II) citrate and rhodium (II) citrate-loaded maghemite nanoparticles in mice bearing breast cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-3155-11-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcella Lemos Brettas Carneiro, Raphael CA Peixoto, Graziela A Joanitti, Ricardo GS Oliveira, Luis AM Telles, Ana L Miranda-Vilela, Anamélia L Bocca, Leonora MS Vianna, Izabel CR da Silva, Aparecido R de Souza, Zulmira GM Lacava, Sônia N Báo |
| Abstract |
Magnetic fluids containing superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles represent an attractive platform as nanocarriers in chemotherapy. Recently, we developed a formulation of maghemite nanoparticles coated with rhodium (II) citrate, which resulted in in vitro cytotoxicity enhanced up to 4.6 times when compared to free rhodium (II) citrate formulation on breast carcinoma cells. In this work, we evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity induced by these formulations in Balb/c mice bearing orthotopic 4T1 breast carcinoma. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Professor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 10% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 24% |
| Unknown | 14 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2015.
All research outputs
#17,679,313
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#766
of 1,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,404
of 191,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,394 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.