You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of 2-Dose BNT162b2 (Pfizer BioNTech) mRNA Vaccine in Preventing SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Children Aged 5–11 Years and Adolescents Aged 12–15 Years — PROTECT Cohort, July 2021–February 2022
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.15585/mmwr.mm7111e1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ashley L. Fowlkes, Sarang K. Yoon, Karen Lutrick, Lisa Gwynn, Joy Burns, Lauren Grant, Andrew L. Phillips, Katherine Ellingson, Maria V. Ferraris, Lindsay B. LeClair, Clare Mathenge, Young M. Yoo, Matthew S. Thiese, Lynn B. Gerald, Natasha Schaefer Solle, Zuha Jeddy, Leah Odame-Bamfo, Josephine Mak, Kurt T. Hegmann, Joe K. Gerald, Jezahel S. Ochoa, Mark Berry, Spencer Rose, Julie Mayo Lamberte, Purnima Madhivanan, Felipe A. Pubillones, Ramona P. Rai, Kayan Dunnigan, John T. Jones, Karl Krupp, Laura J. Edwards, Edward J. Bedrick, Brian E. Sokol, Ashley Lowe, Hilary McLeland-Wieser, Krystal S. Jovel, Deanna E. Fleary, Sana M. Khan, Brandon Poe, James Hollister, Joanna Lopez, Patrick Rivers, Shawn Beitel, Harmony L. Tyner, Allison L. Naleway, Lauren E.W. Olsho, Alberto J. Caban-Martinez, Jefferey L. Burgess, Mark G. Thompson, Manjusha Gaglani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 619 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 98 | 16% |
| United States | 75 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 1% |
| Spain | 8 | 1% |
| Austria | 7 | 1% |
| Canada | 6 | <1% |
| Australia | 5 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 28 | 5% |
| Unknown | 377 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 566 | 91% |
| Scientists | 25 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 24 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 44 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 48 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1261. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#10,973
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#285
of 4,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#469
of 463,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#21
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 333.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.