↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive Bias Modification and Cognitive Control Training in Addiction and Related Psychopathology Mechanisms, Clinical Perspectives, and Ways Forward

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Psychological Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
178 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cognitive Bias Modification and Cognitive Control Training in Addiction and Related Psychopathology Mechanisms, Clinical Perspectives, and Ways Forward
Published in
Clinical Psychological Science, January 2013
DOI 10.1177/2167702612466547
Authors

Reinout W. Wiers, Thomas E. Gladwin, Wilhelm Hofmann, Elske Salemink, K. Richard Ridderinkhof

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Netherlands 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 245 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 22%
Student > Master 47 18%
Student > Bachelor 46 17%
Researcher 40 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 7%
Other 55 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 174 66%
Unspecified 32 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 5%
Neuroscience 10 4%
Other 18 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2018.
All research outputs
#6,156,699
of 12,189,304 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Psychological Science
#370
of 419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,566
of 134,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Psychological Science
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,189,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.