You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Not-so-strategic voters Evidence from an in situ experiment during the 2017 French presidential election
|
---|---|
Published in |
Electoral Studies, April 2022
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102458 |
Authors |
Antoinette Baujard, Isabelle Lebon |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
Professor | 1 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 10% |
Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 4 | 40% |
Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,107,654
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Electoral Studies
#145
of 1,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,039
of 447,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Electoral Studies
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them