↓ Skip to main content

Elastomers three-dimensional biomodels proven to be a trustworthy representation of the angiotomographic images

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Elastomers three-dimensional biomodels proven to be a trustworthy representation of the angiotomographic images
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, September 2016
DOI 10.1590/0004-282x20160113
Pubmed ID
Authors

André Giacomelli Leal, Leonardo Brancia Pagnan, Raphael Teruaki Kondo, José Aguiomar Foggiatto, Guilherme José Agnoletto, Ricardo Ramina

Abstract

3D biomodels were printed with flexible material (elastomer) using angiotomographic DICOM acquired images and compared to 3D digital subtraction angiography (DSA) images. 3D biomodels represented the aneurysm angioarchitecture exactly, especially the neck and domus features. Elastomers 3D biomodels proved to be a trustworthy representation of the angiotomographic images and could be used to help surgical planning in IA treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2016.
All research outputs
#22,763,563
of 25,387,480 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#1,141
of 1,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#306,885
of 347,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#15
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,480 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,363 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.