↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the magnitude of reporting bias in trials of homeopathy: a cross-sectional study and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 1,343)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
35 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
350 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing the magnitude of reporting bias in trials of homeopathy: a cross-sectional study and meta-analysis
Published in
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, March 2022
DOI 10.1136/bmjebm-2021-111846
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerald Gartlehner, Robert Emprechtinger, Marlene Hackl, Franziska L Jutz, Jacob E Gartlehner, Julian N Nonninger, Irma Klerings, Andreea Iulia Dobrescu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 350 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 20%
Other 5 17%
Unspecified 3 10%
Lecturer 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 53%
Unspecified 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 552. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2023.
All research outputs
#35,896
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#15
of 1,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,267
of 440,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.