You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Assessing the magnitude of reporting bias in trials of homeopathy: a cross-sectional study and meta-analysis
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, March 2022
Gerald Gartlehner, Robert Emprechtinger, Marlene Hackl, Franziska L Jutz, Jacob E Gartlehner, Julian N Nonninger, Irma Klerings, Andreea Iulia Dobrescu
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 332 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||254||77%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||29||9%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||8||2%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||17||50%|
|Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine||1||3%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||3%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 538. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,483,002 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
of 1,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 434,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,483,002 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.