You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
The formation of a tissue-engineered cornea using plastically compressed collagen scaffolds and limbal stem cells
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 9 |
| Book title |
Corneal Regenerative Medicine
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-62703-432-6_9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-62703-431-9, 978-1-62703-432-6
|
| Authors |
Mi S, Connon CJ, Shengli Mi, Che J. Connon |
| Editors |
Bernice Wright, Che J Connon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Panama | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 33% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 29% |
| Engineering | 4 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2016.
All research outputs
#15,359,595
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,347
of 13,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,755
of 194,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#12
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.