You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of New Smear-Positive Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients by HIV and Antiretroviral Status in a TB/HIV Clinic, Malawi
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0056248 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hannock Tweya, Caryl Feldacker, Sam Phiri, Anne Ben-Smith, Lukas Fenner, Andreas Jahn, Mike Kalulu, Ralf Weigel, Chancy Kamba, Rabecca Banda, Matthias Egger, Olivia Keiser |
| Abstract |
Smear-positive pulmonary TB is the most infectious form of TB. Previous studies on the effect of HIV and antiretroviral therapy on TB treatment outcomes among these highly infectious patients demonstrated conflicting results, reducing understanding of important issues. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Malawi | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 194 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 51 | 25% |
| Researcher | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 37 | 18% |
| Unknown | 36 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 33 | 16% |
| Unknown | 43 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2013.
All research outputs
#13,303,702
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#106,006
of 193,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,873
of 307,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,598
of 5,159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.