Title |
Medical Schools’ Willingness to Accommodate Medical Students with Sensory and Physical Disabilities: Ethical Foundations of a Functional Challenge to “Organic” Technical Standards
|
---|---|
Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, October 2016
|
DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.10.medu1-1610 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael McKee, Ben Case, Maureen Fausone, Philip Zazove, Alicia Ouellette, Michael D Fetters |
Abstract |
Students with sensory and physical disabilities are underrepresented in medical schools despite the availability of assistive technologies and accommodations. Unfortunately, many medical schools have adopted restrictive "organic" technical standards based on deficits rather than on the ability to do the work. Compelling ethical considerations of justice and beneficence should prompt change in this arena. Medical schools should instead embrace "functional" technical standards that permit accommodations for disabilities and update their admissions policies to promote applications from qualified students with disabilities. Medical schools thus should focus on what students with disabilities can do, rather than what they cannot do, because these students further diversify the health care profession and improve our ability to care for an expanding population of patients with disabilities. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 26 | 42% |
Canada | 6 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 8% |
Sao Tome and Principe | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Israel | 1 | 2% |
Belarus | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 18 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 31 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 21% |
Scientists | 13 | 21% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
Professor | 7 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
Other | 14 | 21% |
Unknown | 16 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 28% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 9% |
Psychology | 4 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 19 | 28% |