You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hip structural analysis: a comparison of DXA with CT in postmenopausal Japanese women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
SpringerPlus, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2193-1801-2-331 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kazuhiro Ohnaru, Teruki Sone, Kensuke Tanaka, Kazumi Akagi, Yong-In Ju, Hak-Jin Choi, Tatsushi Tomomitsu, Masao Fukunaga |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 37 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 23% |
| Researcher | 8 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 18% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 33% |
| Engineering | 9 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2016.
All research outputs
#3,611,410
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#212
of 1,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,211
of 197,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#7
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.