↓ Skip to main content

Identification and functional validation of HPV-mediated hypermethylation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification and functional validation of HPV-mediated hypermethylation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Published in
Genome Medicine, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/gm419
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthias Lechner, Tim Fenton, James West, Gareth Wilson, Andrew Feber, Stephen Henderson, Christina Thirlwell, Harpreet K Dibra, Amrita Jay, Lee Butcher, Ankur R Chakravarthy, Fiona Gratrix, Nirali Patel, Francis Vaz, Paul O'Flynn, Nicholas Kalavrezos, Andrew E Teschendorff, Chris Boshoff, Stephan Beck

Abstract

Human papillomavirus-positive (HPV+) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) represents a distinct clinical and epidemiological condition compared with HPV-negative (HPV-) HNSCC. To test the possible involvement of epigenetic modulation by HPV in HNSCC, we conducted a genome-wide DNA-methylation analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 132 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 21%
Researcher 26 19%
Student > Master 24 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 19 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 20%
Computer Science 3 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 23 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,797,298
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#396
of 1,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,870
of 291,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.