↓ Skip to main content

Frequency Dependence of Signal Power and Spatial Reach of the Local Field Potential

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Frequency Dependence of Signal Power and Spatial Reach of the Local Field Potential
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003137
Pubmed ID
Authors

Szymon Łęski, Henrik Lindén, Tom Tetzlaff, Klas H. Pettersen, Gaute T. Einevoll

Abstract

Despite its century-old use, the interpretation of local field potentials (LFPs), the low-frequency part of electrical signals recorded in the brain, is still debated. In cortex the LFP appears to mainly stem from transmembrane neuronal currents following synaptic input, and obvious questions regarding the 'locality' of the LFP are: What is the size of the signal-generating region, i.e., the spatial reach, around a recording contact? How far does the LFP signal extend outside a synaptically activated neuronal population? And how do the answers depend on the temporal frequency of the LFP signal? Experimental inquiries have given conflicting results, and we here pursue a modeling approach based on a well-established biophysical forward-modeling scheme incorporating detailed reconstructed neuronal morphologies in precise calculations of population LFPs including thousands of neurons. The two key factors determining the frequency dependence of LFP are the spatial decay of the single-neuron LFP contribution and the conversion of synaptic input correlations into correlations between single-neuron LFP contributions. Both factors are seen to give low-pass filtering of the LFP signal power. For uncorrelated input only the first factor is relevant, and here a modest reduction (<50%) in the spatial reach is observed for higher frequencies (>100 Hz) compared to the near-DC ([Formula: see text]) value of about [Formula: see text]. Much larger frequency-dependent effects are seen when populations of pyramidal neurons receive correlated and spatially asymmetric inputs: the low-frequency ([Formula: see text]) LFP power can here be an order of magnitude or more larger than at 60 Hz. Moreover, the low-frequency LFP components have larger spatial reach and extend further outside the active population than high-frequency components. Further, the spatial LFP profiles for such populations typically span the full vertical extent of the dendrites of neurons in the population. Our numerical findings are backed up by an intuitive simplified model for the generation of population LFP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 223 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 84 35%
Researcher 44 18%
Student > Master 23 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 6%
Professor 14 6%
Other 35 15%
Unknown 24 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 67 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 24%
Engineering 38 16%
Physics and Astronomy 15 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 5%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 30 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2014.
All research outputs
#15,045,303
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#6,378
of 9,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,765
of 208,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#62
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.