You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Wall shear stress and relative residence time as potential risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms in males: a 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance case–control study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, March 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12968-022-00848-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chiara Trenti, Magnus Ziegler, Niclas Bjarnegård, Tino Ebbers, Marcus Lindenberger, Petter Dyverfeldt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
Sweden | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 3 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
Researcher | 4 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Student > Master | 2 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 30 | 64% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 8 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 9% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Chemistry | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 30 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,529,103
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#577
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,502
of 464,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 464,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.