You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Association of midlife antibiotic use with subsequent cognitive function in women
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2022
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0264649 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Raaj S Mehta, Paul Lochhead, Yiqing Wang, Wenjie Ma, Long H Nguyen, Bharati Kochar, Curtis Huttenhower, Francine Grodstein, Andrew T Chan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 103 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 17 | 17% |
Spain | 11 | 11% |
Japan | 4 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
France | 2 | 2% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
Dominican Republic | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 58 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 84 | 82% |
Scientists | 11 | 11% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
Professor | 4 | 8% |
Researcher | 4 | 8% |
Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 16% |
Unknown | 21 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 20% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 10% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 14% |
Unknown | 22 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 449. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2023.
All research outputs
#62,928
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#1,065
of 223,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,071
of 447,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#26
of 4,541 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,541 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.