You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gene losses in the common vampire bat illuminate molecular adaptations to blood feeding
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Advances, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.abm6494 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Moritz Blumer, Tom Brown, Mariella Bontempo Freitas, Ana Luiza Destro, Juraci A. Oliveira, Ariadna E. Morales, Tilman Schell, Carola Greve, Martin Pippel, David Jebb, Nikolai Hecker, Alexis-Walid Ahmed, Bogdan M. Kirilenko, Maddy Foote, Axel Janke, Burton K. Lim, Michael Hiller |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 248 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 34 | 14% |
| Germany | 13 | 5% |
| Japan | 12 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 4% |
| Canada | 7 | 3% |
| Spain | 7 | 3% |
| Brazil | 6 | 2% |
| France | 4 | 2% |
| Mexico | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 10% |
| Unknown | 126 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 168 | 68% |
| Scientists | 72 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 17% |
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 21 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 25 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1846. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2023.
All research outputs
#5,072
of 24,525,936 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#74
of 11,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231
of 432,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#4
of 550 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,525,936 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 120.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 550 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.