You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Shape Trail Test: Application of a New Variant of the Trail Making Test
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0057333 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qianhua Zhao, Qihao Guo, Fang Li, Yan Zhou, Bei Wang, Zhen Hong |
| Abstract |
The Trail making test (TMT) is culture-loaded because of reliance on the Latin alphabet, limiting its application in Eastern populations. The Shape Trail Test (STT) has been developed as a new variant. This study is to examine the applicability of the STT in a senile Chinese population and to evaluate its potential advantages and disadvantages. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 131 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 34 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Linguistics | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 42 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2013.
All research outputs
#7,092,575
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#84,106
of 193,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,904
of 192,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,969
of 5,380 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,380 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.