↓ Skip to main content

Sperm DNA damage and assisted reproductive technologies: reasons to be cautious!

Overview of attention for article published in Basic and Clinical Andrology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sperm DNA damage and assisted reproductive technologies: reasons to be cautious!
Published in
Basic and Clinical Andrology, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12610-016-0038-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joël R. Drevet

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Unspecified 1 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Arts and Humanities 1 13%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2018.
All research outputs
#6,773,561
of 12,884,059 outputs
Outputs from Basic and Clinical Andrology
#18
of 53 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,655
of 267,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Basic and Clinical Andrology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,884,059 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them