↓ Skip to main content

Importance of cycle timing for the function of the molecular chaperone Hsp90

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Importance of cycle timing for the function of the molecular chaperone Hsp90
Published in
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, October 2016
DOI 10.1038/nsmb.3305
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bettina K Zierer, Martin Rübbelke, Franziska Tippel, Tobias Madl, Florian H Schopf, Daniel A Rutz, Klaus Richter, Michael Sattler, Johannes Buchner

Abstract

Hsp90 couples ATP hydrolysis to large conformational changes essential for activation of client proteins. The structural transitions involve dimerization of the N-terminal domains and formation of 'closed states' involving the N-terminal and middle domains. Here, we used Hsp90 mutants that modulate ATPase activity and biological function as probes to address the importance of conformational cycling for Hsp90 activity. We found no correlation between the speed of ATP turnover and the in vivo activity of Hsp90: some mutants with almost normal ATPase activity were lethal, and some mutants with lower or undetectable ATPase activity were viable. Our analysis showed that it is crucial for Hsp90 to attain and spend time in certain conformational states: a certain dwell time in open states is required for optimal processing of client proteins, whereas a prolonged population of closed states has negative effects. Thus, the timing of conformational transitions is crucial for Hsp90 function and not cycle speed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Master 6 8%
Professor 5 6%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 20 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 49%
Chemistry 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 23 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2017.
All research outputs
#19,942,887
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
#3,916
of 4,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,536
of 327,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
#34
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.