↓ Skip to main content

Of Mice, Men and Elephants: The Relation between Articular Cartilage Thickness and Body Mass

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Of Mice, Men and Elephants: The Relation between Articular Cartilage Thickness and Body Mass
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0057683
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jos Malda, Janny C. de Grauw, Kim E. M. Benders, Marja J. L. Kik, Chris H. A. van de Lest, Laura B. Creemers, Wouter J. A. Dhert, P. René van Weeren

Abstract

Mammalian articular cartilage serves diverse functions, including shock absorption, force transmission and enabling low-friction joint motion. These challenging requirements are met by the tissue's thickness combined with its highly specific extracellular matrix, consisting of a glycosaminoglycan-interspersed collagen fiber network that provides a unique combination of resilience and high compressive and shear resistance. It is unknown how this critical tissue deals with the challenges posed by increases in body mass. For this study, osteochondral cores were harvested post-mortem from the central sites of both medial and lateral femoral condyles of 58 different mammalian species ranging from 25 g (mouse) to 4000 kg (African elephant). Joint size and cartilage thickness were measured and biochemical composition (glycosaminoclycan, collagen and DNA content) and collagen cross-links densities were analyzed. Here, we show that cartilage thickness at the femoral condyle in the mammalian species investigated varies between 90 µm and 3000 µm and bears a negative allometric relationship to body mass, unlike the isometric scaling of the skeleton. Cellular density (as determined by DNA content) decreases with increasing body mass, but gross biochemical composition is remarkably constant. This however need not affect life-long performance of the tissue in heavier mammals, due to relatively constant static compressive stresses, the zonal organization of the tissue and additional compensation by joint congruence, posture and activity pattern of larger mammals. These findings provide insight in the scaling of articular cartilage thickness with body weight, as well as in cartilage biochemical composition and cellularity across mammalian species. They underscore the need for the use of appropriate in vivo models in translational research aiming at human applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 171 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 34%
Researcher 23 13%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Student > Bachelor 9 5%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 27 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 34 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 4%
Other 42 24%
Unknown 39 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,590,287
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#31,552
of 223,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,510
of 205,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#735
of 5,409 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,409 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.