↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Is Inhaler Technique Adequately Assessed and Reported in Clinical Trials of Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Therapy? A Systematic Review and Suggested Best Practice Checklist

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
30 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Summary Blogs Twitter Facebook Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is Inhaler Technique Adequately Assessed and Reported in Clinical Trials of Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Therapy? A Systematic Review and Suggested Best Practice Checklist
Published in
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, July 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.03.013
Pubmed ID
35364340
Authors

P.N. Richard Dekhuijzen, Mark L. Levy, Chris J. Corrigan, Ruth M. Hadfield, Nicolas Roche, Omar S. Usmani, Peter J. Barnes, Jane E. Scullion, Federico Lavorini, Lorenzo Corbetta, Janwillem W.H. Kocks, Borja G. Cosio, Roland Buhl, Søren E. Pedersen

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 53%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,444,251
of 23,784,266 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
#345
of 3,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,626
of 440,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
#12
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,784,266 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,912 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.