You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ethical Attitudes of German Specialists in Reproductive Medicine and Legal Regulation of Preimplantation Sex Selection in Germany
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0056390 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miriam Wilhelm, Edgar Dahl, Henry Alexander, Elmar Brähler, Yve Stöbel-Richter |
| Abstract |
Because of its ethical and social implications, preimplantation sex selection is frequently the subject of debates. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 30% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 5 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 27% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2013.
All research outputs
#13,882,821
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#111,913
of 193,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,005
of 192,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,838
of 5,380 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,380 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.