↓ Skip to main content

Eukaryotic association module in phage WO genomes from Wolbachia

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
51 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
twitter
106 X users
facebook
16 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
8 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
300 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Eukaryotic association module in phage WO genomes from Wolbachia
Published in
Nature Communications, October 2016
DOI 10.1038/ncomms13155
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah R. Bordenstein, Seth R. Bordenstein

Abstract

Viruses are trifurcated into eukaryotic, archaeal and bacterial categories. This domain-specific ecology underscores why eukaryotic viruses typically co-opt eukaryotic genes and bacteriophages commonly harbour bacterial genes. However, the presence of bacteriophages in obligate intracellular bacteria of eukaryotes may promote DNA transfers between eukaryotes and bacteriophages. Here we report a metagenomic analysis of purified bacteriophage WO particles of Wolbachia and uncover a eukaryotic association module in the complete WO genome. It harbours predicted domains, such as the black widow latrotoxin C-terminal domain, that are uninterrupted in bacteriophage genomes, enriched with eukaryotic protease cleavage sites and combined with additional domains to forge one of the largest bacteriophage genes to date (14,256 bp). To the best of our knowledge, these eukaryotic-like domains have never before been reported in packaged bacteriophages and their phylogeny, distribution and sequence diversity imply lateral transfers between bacteriophage/prophage and animal genomes. Finally, the WO genome sequences and identification of attachment sites will potentially advance genetic manipulation of Wolbachia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 106 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Brazil 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 284 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 83 28%
Researcher 60 20%
Student > Master 37 12%
Student > Bachelor 30 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 39 13%
Unknown 39 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 113 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 75 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 18 6%
Environmental Science 6 2%
Mathematics 5 2%
Other 32 11%
Unknown 51 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 532. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2023.
All research outputs
#47,629
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#773
of 58,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#912
of 327,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#16
of 895 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 895 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.