↓ Skip to main content

The mastermind approach to CNS drug therapy: translational prediction of human brain distribution, target site kinetics, and therapeutic effects

Overview of attention for article published in Fluids and Barriers of the CNS, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The mastermind approach to CNS drug therapy: translational prediction of human brain distribution, target site kinetics, and therapeutic effects
Published in
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/2045-8118-10-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth CM de Lange

Abstract

Despite enormous advances in CNS research, CNS disorders remain the world's leading cause of disability. This accounts for more hospitalizations and prolonged care than almost all other diseases combined, and indicates a high unmet need for good CNS drugs and drug therapies.Following dosing, not only the chemical properties of the drug and blood-brain barrier (BBB) transport, but also many other processes will ultimately determine brain target site kinetics and consequently the CNS effects. The rate and extent of all these processes are regulated dynamically, and thus condition dependent. Therefore, heterogenious conditions such as species, gender, genetic background, tissue, age, diet, disease, drug treatment etc., result in considerable inter-individual and intra-individual variation, often encountered in CNS drug therapy.For effective therapy, drugs should access the CNS "at the right place, at the right time, and at the right concentration". To improve CNS therapies and drug development, details of inter-species and inter-condition variations are needed to enable target site pharmacokinetics and associated CNS effects to be translated between species and between disease states. Specifically, such studies need to include information about unbound drug concentrations which drive the effects. To date the only technique that can obtain unbound drug concentrations in brain is microdialysis. This (minimally) invasive technique cannot be readily applied to humans, and we need to rely on translational approaches to predict human brain distribution, target site kinetics, and therapeutic effects of CNS drugs.In this review the term "Mastermind approach" is introduced, for strategic and systematic CNS drug research using advanced preclinical experimental designs and mathematical modeling. In this way, knowledge can be obtained about the contributions and variability of individual processes on the causal path between drug dosing and CNS effect in animals that can be translated to the human situation. On the basis of a few advanced preclinical microdialysis based investigations it will be shown that the "Mastermind approach" has a high potential for the prediction of human CNS drug effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 170 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 17%
Student > Bachelor 26 15%
Student > Master 18 10%
Other 12 7%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 34 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 46 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 7%
Neuroscience 10 6%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 40 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2013.
All research outputs
#16,188,009
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
#245
of 397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,557
of 195,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.