You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Matt: Local Flexibility Aids Protein Multiple Structure Alignment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0040010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew Menke, Bonnie Berger, Lenore Cowen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 9% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 30% |
| Researcher | 30 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 2% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 50% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 16 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,968,106
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,297
of 8,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,060
of 168,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#18
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.