↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Ceratocystis Canker Resistance, Vegetative Growth, and Fruit Production of ‘Masui Dauphine’ Fig (Ficus carica) Grafted on ‘Reikodai 1 go’ BC1 of an Interspecific Hybridization of F. caric…

Overview of attention for article published in The Horticulture Journal, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of Ceratocystis Canker Resistance, Vegetative Growth, and Fruit Production of ‘Masui Dauphine’ Fig (<i>Ficus carica</i>) Grafted on ‘Reikodai 1 go’ BC<sub>1</sub> of an Interspecific Hybridization of <i>F. carica</i> and <i>F. erecta</i>
Published in
The Horticulture Journal, January 2022
DOI 10.2503/hortj.utd-358
Authors

Masahiro Kamimori, Takeshi Isobe, Hiroshi Yakushiji

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2022.
All research outputs
#21,158,537
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from The Horticulture Journal
#69
of 105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#397,388
of 526,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Horticulture Journal
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 526,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.