Title |
Bifenthrin Causes Trophic Cascade and Altered Insect Emergence in Mesocosms: Implications for Small Streams
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Science & Technology, October 2016
|
DOI | 10.1021/acs.est.6b02761 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Holly A. Rogers, Travis S. Schmidt, Brittanie L. Dabney, Michelle L. Hladik, Barbara J. Mahler, Peter C. Van Metre |
Abstract |
Direct and indirect ecological effects of the widely used insecticide bifenthrin on stream ecosystems are largely unknown. To investigate such effects, a manipulative experiment was conducted in stream mesocosms that were colonized by aquatic insect communities and exposed to bifenthrin-contaminated sediment; implications for natural streams were interpreted through comparison of mesocosm results to a survey of 100 Midwestern streams, USA. In the mesocosm experiment, direct effects of bifenthrin exposure included reduced larval macroinvertebrate abundance, richness, and biomass at concentrations (EC50's ranged from 197.6 to 233.5 ng bifenthrin/g organic carbon) previously thought safe for aquatic life. Indirect effects included a trophic cascade in which periphyton abundance increased after macroinvertebrate scrapers decreased. Adult emergence dynamics and corresponding terrestrial subsidies were altered at all bifenthrin concentrations tested. Extrapolating these results to the Midwestern stream assessment suggests pervasive ecological effects, with altered emergence dynamics likely in 40% of streams and a trophic cascade in 7% of streams. This study provides new evidence that a common pyrethroid might alter aquatic and terrestrial ecosystem function at the regional scale. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 47% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
Canada | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
Scientists | 3 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 61 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 21% |
Student > Master | 12 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Professor | 3 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 17 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 19 | 30% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 27% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 17 | 27% |