You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Smartphone technology enhances newborn intubation knowledge and performance amongst paediatric trainees
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Resuscitation, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.06.025 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Colin Patrick Hawkes, Brian Henry Walsh, C. Anthony Ryan, Eugene Michael Dempsey |
| Abstract |
Smartphones are widely used by physicians, but their effectiveness in improving teaching of clinical skills is not known. The aim of this study was to determine if pre procedural use of a smartphone neonatal intubation instructional application (NeoTube) improves trainee knowledge and enhances procedural skills performance in newborn intubation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 2 | 2% |
| Bahamas | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 27% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2016.
All research outputs
#2,324,675
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Resuscitation
#829
of 5,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,201
of 177,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resuscitation
#7
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.