↓ Skip to main content

Safety and Efficacy of Co-Trimoxazole for Treatment and Prevention of Plasmodium falciparum Malaria: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety and Efficacy of Co-Trimoxazole for Treatment and Prevention of Plasmodium falciparum Malaria: A Systematic Review
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0056916
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Manyando, Eric M. Njunju, Umberto D’Alessandro, Jean-Pierre Van geertruyden

Abstract

Cotrimoxazole (CTX) has been used for half a century. It is inexpensive hence the reason for its almost universal availability and wide clinical spectrum of use. In the last decade, CTX was used for prophylaxis of opportunistic infections in HIV infected people. It also had an impact on the malaria risk in this specific group.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Poland 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 143 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 18%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Postgraduate 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 35 24%
Unknown 26 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 6%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 27 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2019.
All research outputs
#6,254,926
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#74,868
of 193,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,938
of 192,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,660
of 5,396 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,396 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.