↓ Skip to main content

Sequencing of the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) genome provides insights into vertebrate evolution

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
77 X users
facebook
13 Facebook pages
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
572 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
633 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sequencing of the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) genome provides insights into vertebrate evolution
Published in
Nature Genetics, February 2013
DOI 10.1038/ng.2568
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeramiah J Smith, Shigehiro Kuraku, Carson Holt, Tatjana Sauka-Spengler, Ning Jiang, Michael S Campbell, Mark D Yandell, Tereza Manousaki, Axel Meyer, Ona E Bloom, Jennifer R Morgan, Joseph D Buxbaum, Ravi Sachidanandam, Carrie Sims, Alexander S Garruss, Malcolm Cook, Robb Krumlauf, Leanne M Wiedemann, Stacia A Sower, Wayne A Decatur, Jeffrey A Hall, Chris T Amemiya, Nil R Saha, Katherine M Buckley, Jonathan P Rast, Sabyasachi Das, Masayuki Hirano, Nathanael McCurley, Peng Guo, Nicolas Rohner, Clifford J Tabin, Paul Piccinelli, Greg Elgar, Magali Ruffier, Bronwen L Aken, Stephen M J Searle, Matthieu Muffato, Miguel Pignatelli, Javier Herrero, Matthew Jones, C Titus Brown, Yu-Wen Chung-Davidson, Kaben G Nanlohy, Scot V Libants, Chu-Yin Yeh, David W McCauley, James A Langeland, Zeev Pancer, Bernd Fritzsch, Pieter J de Jong, Baoli Zhu, Lucinda L Fulton, Brenda Theising, Paul Flicek, Marianne E Bronner, Wesley C Warren, Sandra W Clifton, Richard K Wilson, Weiming Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 633 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 3%
United Kingdom 7 1%
Spain 5 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
Sweden 4 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Other 15 2%
Unknown 571 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 146 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 136 21%
Student > Master 67 11%
Student > Bachelor 65 10%
Professor 36 6%
Other 107 17%
Unknown 76 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 335 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 123 19%
Neuroscience 17 3%
Environmental Science 15 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 2%
Other 34 5%
Unknown 98 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 125. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#338,790
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#639
of 7,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,110
of 209,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#9
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.