↓ Skip to main content

Post-injection embolia cutis medicamentosa – Nicolau Syndrome: case report and literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal Vascular Brasileiro, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 185)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Post-injection embolia cutis medicamentosa – Nicolau Syndrome: case report and literature review
Published in
Jornal Vascular Brasileiro, April 2016
DOI 10.1590/1677-5449.008315
Authors

Carlos Alberto Araujo Chagas, Tulio Fabiano de Oliveira Leite, Lucas Alves Sarmento Pires

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Jornal Vascular Brasileiro
#25
of 185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,209
of 315,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal Vascular Brasileiro
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 185 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.