You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Preparation and Pharmacokinetic Study of Daidzein Long-Circulating Liposomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Discover Nano, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s11671-019-3164-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qiao Wang, Wenjin Liu, Junjun Wang, Hong Liu, Yong Chen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,540,769
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Discover Nano
#228
of 1,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,203
of 368,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discover Nano
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them