↓ Skip to main content

Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease with a Mediterranean Diet

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
3640 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4885 Mendeley
citeulike
11 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease with a Mediterranean Diet
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, February 2013
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1200303
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ramón Estruch, Emilio Ros, Jordi Salas-Salvadó, Maria-Isabel Covas, Dolores Corella, Fernando Arós, Enrique Gómez-Gracia, Valentina Ruiz-Gutiérrez, Miquel Fiol, José Lapetra, Rosa Maria Lamuela-Raventos, Lluís Serra-Majem, Xavier Pintó, Josep Basora, Miguel Angel Muñoz, José V. Sorlí, José Alfredo Martínez, Miguel Angel Martínez-González

Abstract

Observational cohort studies and a secondary prevention trial have shown an inverse association between adherence to the Mediterranean diet and cardiovascular risk. We conducted a randomized trial of this diet pattern for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,024 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4,885 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 41 <1%
Spain 36 <1%
United Kingdom 19 <1%
Brazil 8 <1%
Australia 7 <1%
Canada 6 <1%
Germany 6 <1%
Netherlands 5 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
Other 35 <1%
Unknown 4718 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 849 17%
Student > Master 641 13%
Researcher 578 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 492 10%
Other 320 7%
Other 1107 23%
Unknown 898 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1675 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 533 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 530 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 263 5%
Social Sciences 112 2%
Other 667 14%
Unknown 1105 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4166. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,135
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#95
of 32,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2
of 206,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#1
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.